From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 2, 2010
CV F 08-0405 AWI DLB (E.D. Cal. Nov. 2, 2010)

Opinion

CV F 08-0405 AWI DLB.

November 2, 2010


ORDER OF STIPULATED DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(ii) AND CLOSING THE CASE


In this action pursuant to the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA"), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., all remaining parties have reached settlement and now move pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to dismiss the action. Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(ii), a plaintiff may voluntarily dismiss an action if she files "a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared." The court finds that all remaining parties in this action have stipulated to dismissal with prejudice.

THEREFORE, it is hereby ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to the stipulation of all parties, each party to bear its own costs and fees. The Clerk of the Courts shall CLOSE the CASE.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Williams v. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 2, 2010
CV F 08-0405 AWI DLB (E.D. Cal. Nov. 2, 2010)
Case details for

Williams v. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada

Case Details

Full title:LAURA WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA, SUN…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Nov 2, 2010

Citations

CV F 08-0405 AWI DLB (E.D. Cal. Nov. 2, 2010)