From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Stewart

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Helena Division
Aug 12, 2010
2:10CV00042SWW/JTK (E.D. Ark. Aug. 12, 2010)

Opinion

2:10CV00042SWW/JTK.

August 12, 2010


ORDER


The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. After a review of those proposed findings and recommendations, and the timely objections received thereto, as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly,

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that defendants' motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 19) is hereby GRANTED IN PART with respect to all claims against defendants Jackson, Clay, Cody, and Harmon, and DENIED with respect to the retaliatory disciplinary claim against defendant Stewart.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Williams v. Stewart

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Helena Division
Aug 12, 2010
2:10CV00042SWW/JTK (E.D. Ark. Aug. 12, 2010)
Case details for

Williams v. Stewart

Case Details

Full title:DAVID WILLIAMS, ADC #78730 PLAINTIFF v. KATHY STEWART, et al. DEFENDANTS

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Helena Division

Date published: Aug 12, 2010

Citations

2:10CV00042SWW/JTK (E.D. Ark. Aug. 12, 2010)