From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. State

Supreme Court of Nevada.
Jul 14, 2011
373 P.3d 973 (Nev. 2011)

Opinion

No. 56568.

07-14-2011

Antoine Liddell WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Nevada, Respondent.

Clark County Public Defender Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney


Clark County Public Defender

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

This is an appeal from a district court order denying a motion for a new trial in a death penalty case. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Stefany Miley, Judge.

Appellant Antoine Williams claims that the district court erred when it dismissed his second motion for a new trial. In our order affirming the dismissal of his first new trial motion, we stated that his motion, filed over 10 years after his conviction became final, was untimely. Williams v. State, Docket No. 54027 (Order of Affirmance, April 8, 2010). His second motion is also untimely, see NRS 176.515(4) (stating that motion for new trial based on grounds other than newly-discovered evidence must be filed or addressed by the trial court within seven days after verdict), and we therefore conclude that the district court did not err in dismissing it.

Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Williams v. State

Supreme Court of Nevada.
Jul 14, 2011
373 P.3d 973 (Nev. 2011)
Case details for

Williams v. State

Case Details

Full title:Antoine Liddell WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Nevada, Respondent.

Court:Supreme Court of Nevada.

Date published: Jul 14, 2011

Citations

373 P.3d 973 (Nev. 2011)