From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. State

State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals
Oct 20, 2016
NO. 14-16-00781-CR (Tex. App. Oct. 20, 2016)

Opinion

NO. 14-16-00781-CR

10-20-2016

RONNEY EARL WILLIAMS, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


On Appeal from the 232nd District Court Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 1476283

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant entered a guilty plea to attempted forgery of a government instrument. In accordance with the terms of a plea bargain agreement with the State, the trial court sentenced appellant on March 14, 2016, to confinement for eleven months in the State Jail Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal. On July 7, 2016, this court dismissed appellant's appeal on the grounds that appellant entered into a plea bargain and had no right to appeal. On September 16, 2016, appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal in an apparent attempt to appeal this court's decision dismissing his appeal.

A defendant's notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days after sentence is imposed when the defendant has not filed a motion for new trial. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1). A notice of appeal that complies with the requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26 is essential to vest the court of appeals with jurisdiction. Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998). If an appeal is not timely perfected, a court of appeals does not obtain jurisdiction to address the merits of the appeal. Under those circumstances it can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal. Id.

Moreover, this court does not have jurisdiction over an appeal of its own opinion. See generally Tex. R. App. P. 66.1 (Court of Criminal Appeals may review a court of appeals' decision in a criminal case). Because this appeal does not fall within the exceptions to the general rule that appeal may be taken only from a final judgment of conviction, we have no jurisdiction. Even if we were to treat appellant's appeal as a motion for rehearing, it is untimely. See Tex. R. App. P. 49.1.

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Boyce and Christopher.
Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).


Summaries of

Williams v. State

State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals
Oct 20, 2016
NO. 14-16-00781-CR (Tex. App. Oct. 20, 2016)
Case details for

Williams v. State

Case Details

Full title:RONNEY EARL WILLIAMS, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals

Date published: Oct 20, 2016

Citations

NO. 14-16-00781-CR (Tex. App. Oct. 20, 2016)