Williams v. State

1 Citing case

  1. Holcomb v. State

    484 S.W.2d 929 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972)   Cited 25 times

    Clearly, the question was not leading and the conversation which ensued during the course of the robbery was res gestae of the offense and admissible, even though it involved extraneous offenses as an exception to the general rule prohibiting the admission of extraneous offenses. See Carrier v. State, 159 Tex.Crim. 421, 264 S.W.2d 728 (1954); Reed v. State, 421 S.W.2d 116 (Tex.Cr.App. 1967); Williams v. State, 414 S.W.2d 183 (Tex.Cr.App. 1967). It is also observed that without objection the witness Davis subsequently testified the appellant told him during the course of the robbery `. . . to get a good look at him (appellant);' that `he was wanted plenty.'