From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Oct 6, 1998
977 S.W.2d 934 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)

Opinion

No. 73539.

OPINION FILED: October 6, 1998.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF FRANKLIN COUNTY; HONORABLE JEFF SCHAEPERKOETTER, JUDGE.

Douglas R. Hoff, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for Appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Kenneth P. Ferguson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for Respondent.

Before PAUL J. SIMON, P.J., and KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, JJ.


ORDER


Steve Williams (Movant) appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court's determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Williams v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Oct 6, 1998
977 S.W.2d 934 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)
Case details for

Williams v. State

Case Details

Full title:STEVE R. WILLIAMS, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three

Date published: Oct 6, 1998

Citations

977 S.W.2d 934 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)