From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Apr 3, 2012
83 So. 3d 929 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. 3D08–2674.

2012-04-3

Joseph WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami–Dade County, Beatrice A. Butchko, Judge.Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Billie Jan Goldstein, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Linda S. Katz, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.


An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami–Dade County, Beatrice A. Butchko, Judge.Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Billie Jan Goldstein, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Linda S. Katz, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before , EMAS, and FERNANDEZ, JJ.

CORTIÑAS, J.

We affirm the final judgment and sentence of the circuit court in all respects except his conviction for unlawful possession of a firearm during the commission of a criminal offense. Appellant correctly argues that his conviction on this count is illegal and must be vacated as violative of the double jeopardy clause where he was also convicted of one count of armed carjacking, for which a minimum mandatory sentence of ten years was imposed. See Cleveland v. State, 587 So.2d 1145 (Fla.1991); Merrell v. State, 841 So.2d 677 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003); Hall v. State, 752 So.2d 1245 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.


Summaries of

Williams v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Apr 3, 2012
83 So. 3d 929 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)
Case details for

Williams v. State

Case Details

Full title:Joseph WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Date published: Apr 3, 2012

Citations

83 So. 3d 929 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

Citing Cases

Williams v. State

The State cannot, consistent with double jeopardy principles, charge, convict and sentence a defendant with…

Gracia v. State

We agree with the sole contention on this appeal that, as a matter of fundamental error which need not be, as…