From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Jan 10, 2002
65 S.W.3d 401 (Ark. 2002)

Opinion

CR 01-1170

Opinion Delivered January 10, 2002

Appeal error — public defenders cannot be paid separately to file appeals — motion to be relieved as counsel granted. — Because public defenders cannot be paid separately to file appeals, the motion of appellant's counsel, a state-salaried, full-time public defender, who had been appointed to represent appellant, an indigent defendant, to be relieved as attorney for appellant was granted.

Amended Motion to be Relieved as Attorney for Appellant and Stay Briefing Schedule; granted.

Thomas B. Devine, III, for appellant.

No response.


Thomas B. Devine, III, as a state-salaried, full-time public defender, was appointed by the trial court to represent appellant Phillip Williams, an indigent defendant, in this criminal case. Williams was convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment in the Arkansas Department of Correction. Mr. Devine timely filed a notice of appeal from the judgment of conviction and lodged the appellate record with the Supreme Court Clerk.

[1] Mr. Devine now asks this court to relieve him as appellant's counsel and to appoint new counsel. Mr. Devine cites Rushing v. State, 340 Ark. 84, 8 S.W.3d 489 (2000), that public defenders cannot be paid separately to file appeals. Accordingly, we grant Mr. Devine's motion to be relieved for good cause shown. Mr. Tim Cullen will be substituted as appellant's attorney in this matter.

Act 1370 of 2001 provides that part-time public defenders may receive compensation from appellate courts.

Imber, J., not participating.


Summaries of

Williams v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Jan 10, 2002
65 S.W.3d 401 (Ark. 2002)
Case details for

Williams v. State

Case Details

Full title:Phillip WILLIAMS, Appellant v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee

Court:Supreme Court of Arkansas

Date published: Jan 10, 2002

Citations

65 S.W.3d 401 (Ark. 2002)
65 S.W.3d 401

Citing Cases

Washington v. State

Accordingly, we grant Mr. Fraiser's motion to be relieved for good cause shown. See Jones v. State, 349 Ark.…

Newman v. State

Accordingly, we now grant Mr. Marquette's motion to be relieved for good cause shown. See Jones v. State, 349…