From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
May 13, 2003
105 S.W.3d 541 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)

Opinion

No. ED 81377

May 13, 2003

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Honorable Angela D. Turner Guigless.

Edward S. Thompson, St. Louis, Missouri, for Appellant.

John M. Morris, Anne E. Edgington, Jefferson City, Missouri, for Respondent.

Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and George W. Draper III, J.



ORDER


Billy Williams (hereinafter, "Movant") appeals from the motion court's judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 29.15 without an evidentiary hearing. Movant claims his trial counsel denied him effective assistance of counsel by failing to strike an unfit venire person. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the transcript and find the motion court's decision was not clearly erroneous. State v. Lacy, 851 S.W.2d 623, 631 (Mo.App.E.D. 1993). An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

DOWD, JR., R., P.J., HOFF, J., AND DRAPER, J. concurring.


Summaries of

Williams v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
May 13, 2003
105 S.W.3d 541 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)
Case details for

Williams v. State

Case Details

Full title:BILLY WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: May 13, 2003

Citations

105 S.W.3d 541 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)