From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Jan 16, 2007
211 S.W.3d 627 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007)

Opinion

No. ED 87522.

January 16, 2007.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Larry Kendrick, Judge.

Michelle M. Rivera, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Karen L. Kramer, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and NANNETTE A. BAKER, J.

Prior report: 122 S.W.3d 716.


ORDER


Edward S. Walsh ("movant") appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Missouri Supreme Court Rule 29.15 on the merits after an evidentiary hearing. Movant claims the motion court clearly erred in denying his request for post-conviction relief because he was denied effective assistance of counsel.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinior for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Williams v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Jan 16, 2007
211 S.W.3d 627 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007)
Case details for

Williams v. State

Case Details

Full title:Edward WALSH, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District

Date published: Jan 16, 2007

Citations

211 S.W.3d 627 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007)

Citing Cases

Walsh v. Mueller

Exhs. G, H). The Missouri Court of Appeals affirmed the denial of Petitioner's post-conviction motion. Walsh…