Williams v. State

Full title: YUSAF WILLIAMS, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent

Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three

Date published: May 9, 2001

43 S.W.3d 901 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

No. ED78630

Filed: May 9, 2001

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS, HONORABLE JOAN BURGER

Paul F. Keeven Evans Dixon, Attorneys v. Mary Anne Lindsey, 1200 Saint Louis Place, 200 North Broadway, St. Louis, MO 63102-2749, for appellant.

James J. Logan, MCMICHAEL LOGAN, Timothy A. Engelmeyer, 1400 Elbridge Payne Road, Suite 220, Chesterfield, MO 63017, for respondent.

Before Gary M. Gaertner, Sr., P.J., Lawrence G. Crahan, J., and George W. Draper III, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Movant Yusaf Williams appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for postconviction relief. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court's determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).