From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. State

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
May 8, 1911
115 P. 379 (Okla. Crim. App. 1911)

Opinion

No. A_____.

Opinion Filed May 8, 1911.

(Syllabus.)

Appeal and Error — Abatement — Death of Accused Pending Appeal. Where accused dies after conviction and pending an appeal, but before final submission of the cause, the proceedings abate.

Appeal from District Court, McCurtain County; D.A. Richardson, Judge.

Byington Williams was convicted of assault with intent to do bodily harm, and he appeals. Ordered that the proceedings abate.

J.E. Whitehead, for plaintiff in error.

Smith C. Matson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.


Plaintiff in error was convicted in the district court of McCurtain county of the crime of assault to do bodily harm, and sentenced to imprisonment in the state penitentiary for two years at hard labor. Judgment and sentence was pronounced and entered on the 6th day of October, 1909. From such judgment an appeal was taken by filing in this court on January 19, 1910, a petition in error with case-made.

Since the appeal was taken, and before the final submission of the cause, to wit, April 23, 1911, plaintiff in error has departed this life. His death having been suggested, the proceedings abate.

"In a criminal action, the purpose of the proceeding being to punish the defendant in person, the action must necessarily abate upon his death." Pim Boyd v. State, 3 Okla. Cr. 684, 108 P. 431.

It is therefore considered that the proceedings in this action do abate; and it is so ordered.


Summaries of

Williams v. State

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
May 8, 1911
115 P. 379 (Okla. Crim. App. 1911)
Case details for

Williams v. State

Case Details

Full title:BYINGTON WILLIAMS v. STATE

Court:Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma

Date published: May 8, 1911

Citations

115 P. 379 (Okla. Crim. App. 1911)
115 P. 379

Citing Cases

Hartwell v. State

Melrose Distillers, Inc., v. United States, 359 U.S. 271, 79 S.Ct. 763, 3 L.Ed.2d 800 (1959); Crooker v.…