From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Dec 14, 1926
110 So. 927 (Ala. Crim. App. 1926)

Opinion

1 Div. 672.

December 14, 1926.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Mobile County; T. J. Bedsole, Judge.

Foster K. Hale, Jr., of Mobile, for appellant.

Harwell G. Davis, Atty. Gen., for the State.


The corpus delicti having been proven the confession of defendant as testified to by the witness Hagan, together with the other facts and circumstances testified to by the other witness for the state, were sufficient to connect the defendant with the crime charged. The general charge as requested by defendant was properly refused. Exceptions reserved upon rulings of the court are of such a nature as not to injuriously affect the substantial rights of defendant, so as to constitute reversible error. We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Williams v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Dec 14, 1926
110 So. 927 (Ala. Crim. App. 1926)
Case details for

Williams v. State

Case Details

Full title:Lawrence WILLIAMS v. STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Dec 14, 1926

Citations

110 So. 927 (Ala. Crim. App. 1926)
21 Ala. App. 701