From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Apr 6, 2005
899 So. 2d 451 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

Opinion

No. 4D05-847.

April 6, 2005.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800(a) motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Elijah H. Williams, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 02-8056 CF10A 03-10320 CF10A.

Eric L. Williams, South Bay, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.


Appellant seeks review of an order denying his motion to correct an illegal sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Appellant claims that his prior record should not have been scored on his Criminal Punishment Code scoresheet because he was released from incarceration on the prior offenses more than ten years before he committed the current offenses. The 3.800(a) motion does not allege that the face of the record demonstrates that he is entitled to relief and appellant did not identify where in the record information showing his entitlement to relief could be found. See Milne v. State, 807 So.2d 725 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); Skullestad v. State, 790 So.2d 516 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). In addition, the state and appellant disagree about when he was released from supervision, and resolution of this claim would require an evidentiary hearing. See Maynard v. State, 763 So.2d 480 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); Black v. State, 754 So.2d 792 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).

Accordingly, we affirm the circuit court's order without prejudice for appellant to file a rule 3.850 motion.

FARMER, C.J., STONE and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Williams v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Apr 6, 2005
899 So. 2d 451 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)
Case details for

Williams v. State

Case Details

Full title:Eric L. WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Apr 6, 2005

Citations

899 So. 2d 451 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

Citing Cases

Hathcock v. State

We affirm the circuit court's orders without prejudice for appellant to file a legally sufficient rule…