From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 22, 1986
487 So. 2d 94 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

Opinion

No. 85-1247.

April 22, 1986.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, for Dade County; Edward D. Cowart, Judge.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, Joel Hirschhorn and Andrew Cotzin, Sp. Asst. Public Defenders, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Calianne P. Lantz, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, BASKIN and JORGENSON, JJ.


Defendant Robert Williams raises two points in his appeal from judgment of conviction of second-degree murder and a sentence of fifteen years imprisonment. Under the facts of this case, we discern no abuse of discretion in the trial court's decision to permit rebuttal testimony and to deny Williams's request to present surrebuttal evidence. Gandy v. State, 440 So.2d 432 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). The remaining point lacks merit.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Williams v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 22, 1986
487 So. 2d 94 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)
Case details for

Williams v. State

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT A. WILLIAMS, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Apr 22, 1986

Citations

487 So. 2d 94 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

Citing Cases

Reaves v. State

Surrebuttal testimony is properly admitted in Florida subject to the trial court's discretion. See Davis v.…

Cruse v. State

The decision to allow or disallow surrebuttal evidence rests within the sound discretion of the trial judge.…