From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Oct 10, 1972
267 So. 2d 86 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)

Opinion

No. 72-358.

October 10, 1972.

Appeal from Criminal Court of Record, Dade County; Jack M. Turner, Judge.

Phillip A. Hubbart, Public Defender, and Alan S. Becker, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Arnold R. Ginsberg, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, HENDRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.


Appellant was convicted of breaking and entering a dwelling with the intent to commit a felony, to-wit: grand larceny, also of petit larceny under an additional count of the information. She was found guilty and sentenced to a term of one year in the Dade County Jail on the breaking and entering count, and sentenced to a term of six months, to run concurrently, on the petit larceny count.

Appellant contends that the evidence introduced was circumstantial and failed to exclude every reasonable hypothesis of innocence, therefore, it was error for the trial court to deny her motion for judgment of acquittal.

We have carefully reviewed the record and considered the briefs of counsel and have concluded that the trial judge was correct in denying the motion of defendant. We find sufficient competent evidence in the record to support the convictions. No reversible error having been demonstrated, the judgments and sentences are affirmed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Williams v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Oct 10, 1972
267 So. 2d 86 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)
Case details for

Williams v. State

Case Details

Full title:SHIRLEY MOORE WILLIAMS, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Oct 10, 1972

Citations

267 So. 2d 86 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)