From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jan 20, 1999
740 So. 2d 3 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Summary

reversing violent career criminal sentence based on Thompson and remanding for resentencing

Summary of this case from Barnes v. State

Opinion

No. 97-04516.

Opinion filed January 20, 1999.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County, Chet A. Tharpe, Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Richard J. Sanders, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Susan D. Dunlevy, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


Henry Williams appeals from his sentence as a violent career criminal for an offense occurring on November 27, 1996. InThompson v. State, 708 So.2d 315 (Fla. 2d DCA),review granted, 717 So.2d 538 (Fla. 1998), this court held that chapter 95-182, Laws of Florida, which created violent career criminal sentencing, is unconstitutional as a violation of the single subject rule. Thus, based on Thompson, we reverse Williams' violent career criminal sentence and remand for resentencing in accordance with the valid laws in effect at the time of Williams' sentencing on October 1, 1997.

Reversed and remanded.

PARKER, C.J., and DANAHY PAUL W., (SENIOR) JUDGE, Concur.


Summaries of

Williams v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jan 20, 1999
740 So. 2d 3 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

reversing violent career criminal sentence based on Thompson and remanding for resentencing

Summary of this case from Barnes v. State
Case details for

Williams v. State

Case Details

Full title:HENRY WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jan 20, 1999

Citations

740 So. 2d 3 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Citing Cases

State v. Williams

PER CURIAM. We have for review Williams v. State, 740 So.2d 3 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999), in which the Second…

Barnes v. State

Had appellate counsel raised the issue, this court would have remanded for resentencing in accordance with…