From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Apr 30, 2003
844 So. 2d 700 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

Opinion

Case No. 2D02-4142.

Opinion filed April 30, 2003.

Appeal pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Charles Lee Brown, Judge.


Eric O. Williams appeals the summary denial of his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The trial court ruled the motion was facially insufficient. We affirm.

Williams listed four actions by trial counsel that he alleged constituted ineffective assistance of counsel. We agree with the trial court's ruling that Williams' sworn motion is facially insufficient because it fails to allege that but for counsel's errors, he would not have pleaded no contest. See Davis v. State, 697 So.2d 957, 958 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997); Richardson v. State, 829 So.2d 364, 365 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002);Brazeail v. State, 821 So.2d 364, 368 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).

We affirm without prejudice to Williams' right to file a facially sufficient rule 3.850 motion. Because the two-year limit for filing rule 3.850 motions expired while this motion was pending, we direct that Williams may file another rule 3.850 motion within thirty days of the date of this court's mandate, and the trial court shall not deem it untimely or deem it successive based upon the motion Williams filed in this proceeding. See Lewis v. State, 777 So.2d 1083 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001);Lanier v. State, 800 So.2d 242, 243 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001).

Affirmed.

FULMER and KELLY, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Williams v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Apr 30, 2003
844 So. 2d 700 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)
Case details for

Williams v. State

Case Details

Full title:ERIC O. WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Apr 30, 2003

Citations

844 So. 2d 700 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

Citing Cases

Rosado v. State

To the extent the trial court on remand may determine that the motion is facially insufficient for failing to…

Heath v. State

We affirm the order of the trial court without prejudice to any right Heath might have to file a facially…