From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jul 14, 2004
884 So. 2d 138 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

Opinion

No. 2D04-743.

July 14, 2004.

Appeal pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Dennis P. Maloney, Judge.


Kenneth L. Williams seeks review of the trial court's order summarily denying his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Williams' motion was based in part on a claim of newly discovered evidence that was facially insufficient. Therefore, we affirm the order of the trial court without prejudice to Williams' right to file a facially sufficient claim based on newly discovered evidence. We affirm without comment the trial court's summary denial of Williams' other claims.

Affirmed without prejudice to Williams' right to refile a facially sufficient claim based on newly discovered evidence within sixty days of the issuance of the mandate in this case.

FULMER and STRINGER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Williams v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jul 14, 2004
884 So. 2d 138 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)
Case details for

Williams v. State

Case Details

Full title:Kenneth L. WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jul 14, 2004

Citations

884 So. 2d 138 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

Citing Cases

Wilson v. State

Accordingly, we affirm, but without prejudice to appellant's filing a sworn, facially sufficient amended…

Connolly v. State

Affirmed. See Huffman v. State, 909 So. 2d 922 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005), review denied, 929 So. 2d 1053 (Fla.…