From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Aug 6, 2003
851 So. 2d 289 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

Opinion

Case No. 3D03-934.

Opinion filed August 6, 2003.

An appeal under Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Peter R. Lopez, Judge, Lower Tribunal No. 90-49006.

Chey L. Williams, in proper person.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, for appellee.

Before COPE, GERSTEN and RAMIREZ, JJ.


Chey Lamont Williams appeals an order denying his motion to correct illegal sentence. We affirm.

Defendant-appellant Williams was given consecutive sentences as a departure sentence. These were affirmed without opinion on his direct appeal. Williams v. State, 601 So.2d 566 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992). In a subsequent motion for postconviction relief, it was determined that the legal maximum on count two was thirty years and the sentence on that count was corrected accordingly. As corrected, the consecutive sentences are within the legal maximum and are legal sentences. The current motion to correct illegal sentence was correctly denied.

Affirmed.

We have taken judicial notice of this court's file in Williams v. State, 781 So.2d 1098 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001).

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DISPOSED OF.


Summaries of

Williams v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Aug 6, 2003
851 So. 2d 289 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)
Case details for

Williams v. State

Case Details

Full title:CHEY LAMONT WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Aug 6, 2003

Citations

851 So. 2d 289 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)