From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 11, 2004
865 So. 2d 637 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

Opinion

Case No. 3D02-11.

Opinion filed February 11, 2004.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jose M. Rodriguez, Judge, LOWER Tribunal No. 88-2091.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Robert Kalter, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Charlie Crist, Attorney General and Michael J. Neimand, Assistant Public Defender, for appellee.

Before LEVY, GREEN, and RAMIREZ, JJ.


This appeal recurs upon a mandate issued by the Supreme Court of Florida on December 11, 2003. We vacate the harmless error analysis portion of our previous opinion, recorded at 834 So.2d 923, and conform in all respects to the opinion of the Supreme Court recorded at 2003 WL 229087788, 28 Fla. L. Weekly S853 (Fla. 2003). As directed by that opinion and mandate we now apply the principles announced in Goodwin v. State, 751 So.2d 547 (Fla. 1999), and State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla. 1986), and reconsider this matter under the DiGuilio harmless error standard.

Accordingly, we hereby affirm the conviction and sentence under review finding that, although the trial court abused its discretion in not permitting the defense to elicit the fact that Hunt had been expelled from the police explorers, there was no reasonable possibility that this error affected the verdict. We therefore, affirm.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DISPOSED OF


Summaries of

Williams v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 11, 2004
865 So. 2d 637 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)
Case details for

Williams v. State

Case Details

Full title:NATHANIEL WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Feb 11, 2004

Citations

865 So. 2d 637 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)