Opinion
No. SC08-1496.
October 27, 2008.
Lower Tribunal No(s). 4D08-536, 86-14271CF10A.
Because petitioner has failed to show that the respondent has a ministerial duty to supplement the record on appeal with non-record documents, the petition for writ of mandamus is hereby denied. See Huffman v. State, 813 So. 2d 10, 11 (Fla. 2000); see also Migliore v. City of Lauderhill, 415 So. 2d 62, 63 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982) (stating that mandamus "is [not] proper to mandate the doing (or undoing) of a discretionary act"), approved, 431 So. 2d 986 (Fla. 1983). WELLS, ANSTEAD, LEWIS, CANADY, and POLSTON, JJ., concur.