From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Apr 4, 2002
810 So. 2d 985 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

No. 4D01-3353.

February 13, 2002. Rehearing Denied April 4, 2002.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Geoffrey D. Cohen, Judge.

Travis Williams, Miami, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.


We affirm the denial of appellant's rule 3.850 motion and certify as a question of great public importance the same question certified in Stretcher v. State, 803 So.2d 813 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001):

WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT OR COUNSEL HAVE A DUTY TO ADVISE A DEFENDANT THAT HIS PLEA IN A PENDING CASE MAY HAVE SENTENCE ENHANCING CONSEQUENCES IF THE DEFENDANT COMMITS A NEW CRIME IN THE FUTURE?

POLEN, C.J., STONE and KLEIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Williams v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Apr 4, 2002
810 So. 2d 985 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

Williams v. State

Case Details

Full title:TRAVIS WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Apr 4, 2002

Citations

810 So. 2d 985 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)