Opinion
No. 175, 2015.
07-21-2015
David M. WILLIAMS, Defendant Below–Appellant, v. STATE of Delaware, Plaintiff Below–Appellee.
ORDER
JAMES T. VAUGHN, JR., Justice.
This 21st day of July 2015, after careful consideration of David Williams' opening brief, the State's motion to affirm, and the record on appeal, we find it manifest that the judgment below should be affirmed on the basis of the Superior Court's well-reasoned decision dated March 26, 2015. The Superior Court did not err in concluding that Williams' tenth motion for postconviction relief was procedurally barred and that he had failed to overcome the procedural hurdles. Moreover, Williams' belated contention that he was sentenced as a habitual offender for a predicate offense that he committed as a juvenile is simply incorrect as a matter of fact.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.