From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Jun 28, 2022
646 S.W.3d 747 (Mo. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

WD 84625

06-28-2022

In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of Rodney WILLIAMS, a/k/a Rodney V. Williams, a/k/a Rodney Vashon Williams, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Amy Lowe, Assistant Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, Attorney for Appellant. Eric S. Schmitt, Attorney General, and George R. Lankford, Assistant Attorney General, St. Louis, MO, Attorneys for Respondent.


Amy Lowe, Assistant Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, Attorney for Appellant.

Eric S. Schmitt, Attorney General, and George R. Lankford, Assistant Attorney General, St. Louis, MO, Attorneys for Respondent.

Before Division Two: Karen King Mitchell, Presiding Judge, and Edward R. Ardini, Jr., and Thomas N. Chapman, Judges

Order

Per Curiam: Rodney Williams appeals, following a bench trial, his civil commitment as a sexually violent predator. Williams raises a single claim on appeal; he argues that trial counsel was ineffective for introducing evidence that Williams has a mild intellectual disability, which he claims actually benefited the State's case insofar as the presence of an intellectual disability increased Williams's estimated risk of reoffending. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Williams v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Jun 28, 2022
646 S.W.3d 747 (Mo. Ct. App. 2022)
Case details for

Williams v. State

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of Rodney WILLIAMS, a/k/a Rodney…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Jun 28, 2022

Citations

646 S.W.3d 747 (Mo. Ct. App. 2022)