From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. State

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
Feb 5, 2020
NO. 09-19-00188-CR (Tex. App. Feb. 5, 2020)

Opinion

NO. 09-19-00188-CR

02-05-2020

BRAD ELLIOTT WILLIAMS, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


On Appeal from the 145th District Court Nacogdoches County, Texas
Trial Cause No. F1823791

MEMORANDUM OPINION

A jury found appellant Brad Elliott Williams guilty of aggravated robbery and assessed punishment as a prior felony offender at twenty-seven years of imprisonment and a $200 fine.

Williams's appellate counsel filed a brief that presents counsel's professional evaluation of the record and concludes the appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). On October 21, 2019, we granted an extension of time for Williams to file a pro se brief. We received no response from Williams.

We reviewed the appellate record, and we agree with counsel's conclusion that no arguable issues support an appeal. Therefore, we find it unnecessary to order appointment of new counsel to re-brief the appeal. Cf. Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). We affirm the trial court's judgment.

Williams may challenge our decision in this case by filing a petition for discretionary review. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.

AFFIRMED.

/s/_________

STEVE McKEITHEN

Chief Justice Submitted on January 27, 2020
Opinion Delivered February 5, 2020
Do Not Publish Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.


Summaries of

Williams v. State

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
Feb 5, 2020
NO. 09-19-00188-CR (Tex. App. Feb. 5, 2020)
Case details for

Williams v. State

Case Details

Full title:BRAD ELLIOTT WILLIAMS, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

Date published: Feb 5, 2020

Citations

NO. 09-19-00188-CR (Tex. App. Feb. 5, 2020)