From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. State

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Aug 1, 2019
278 So. 3d 226 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)

Opinion

No. 1D17-4593

08-01-2019

Daniel Lamar WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Barbara J. Busharis, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Benjamin L. Hoffman, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Barbara J. Busharis, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Benjamin L. Hoffman, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED . See Kline v. State , 274 So.3d 525, 2019 WL 2399700 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019) (holding that where it is unclear whether the trial court used the correct standard to deny a motion for new trial, "the potential that the trial court erred does not reach the level of fundamental error").

Ray, C.J., and Rowe, J., concur; Osterhaus, J., dissents with opinion.

Osterhaus, J., dissenting.

I would reverse and remand for further consideration. See Palmer v. State , 196 So. 3d 1289 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016).


Summaries of

Williams v. State

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Aug 1, 2019
278 So. 3d 226 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
Case details for

Williams v. State

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL LAMAR WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Aug 1, 2019

Citations

278 So. 3d 226 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)

Citing Cases

Barr v. State

Kline v. State , 274 So. 3d 525, 526 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019) (affirming where the trial court denied the motion…