From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Starling

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jun 28, 2007
231 F. App'x 274 (4th Cir. 2007)

Opinion

No. 07-6343.

Submitted: June 21, 2007.

Decided: June 28, 2007.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., Chief District Judge. (1:02-cv-00014).

Stanley Lorenzo Williams, Appellant Pro Se. David J. Adinolfi, II, Assistant Attorney General, Michael David Youth, North Carolina Department of Justice, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Stanley Lorenzo Williams appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying Williams, Fed.R.Civ.P. 65 motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Williams v. Starling, No. 1:02-cv-00014 (M.D.N.C. Sept. 26, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Williams v. Starling

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jun 28, 2007
231 F. App'x 274 (4th Cir. 2007)
Case details for

Williams v. Starling

Case Details

Full title:Stanley Lorenzo WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ron STARLING; Marc…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jun 28, 2007

Citations

231 F. App'x 274 (4th Cir. 2007)