From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Starling

United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Nov 4, 2004
No. 1:02CV00014 (M.D.N.C. Nov. 4, 2004)

Opinion

No. 1:02CV00014.

November 4, 2004


JUDGMENT


On October 4, 2004, Recommendation No. 3 of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed and notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. No objections were filed within the time limits prescribed by Section 636.

Therefore, the Court need not make a de novo review and the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation is hereby adopted.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that defendants Gregory, Starling, and Sharpe's motion for summary judgment (docket no. 48) is granted, that plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (docket no. 64) is denied, that plaintiff's request for a ruling (docket no. 77) is denied for being moot, and that this action be, and the same hereby is, dismissed.


Summaries of

Williams v. Starling

United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Nov 4, 2004
No. 1:02CV00014 (M.D.N.C. Nov. 4, 2004)
Case details for

Williams v. Starling

Case Details

Full title:STANLEY LORENZO WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. RON STARLING, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Date published: Nov 4, 2004

Citations

No. 1:02CV00014 (M.D.N.C. Nov. 4, 2004)