From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. St Francis Urology

United States District Court, Middle District of Georgia
Sep 20, 2023
4:23-cv-25 (CDL) (M.D. Ga. Sep. 20, 2023)

Opinion

4:23-cv-25 (CDL)

09-20-2023

EMMETT L WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. ST FRANCIS UROLOGY et al., Defendants.


ORDER

CLAY D. LAND U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

The Court previously concluded that Plaintiff had not properly served Defendants or shown that they were proper defendants or legal entities capable of being sued. Order 2, Williams v. St. Francis Urology, 4:23-cv-25 (CDL) (M.D. Ga. Aug. 23, 2023), ECF No. 5. The Court further concluded that Plaintiff's Complaint did not identify a basis for federal subject matter jurisdiction. Id. at 2. Despite these deficiencies, the Court provided Plaintiff with more time to file proof of proper service and an opportunity to amend his Complaint. The Court warned that if Plaintiff did not provide sufficient evidence of service and amend his Complaint by September 15, 2023, the Court would dismiss this action without prejudice. Id. at 3. Plaintiff did not file an amended complaint by the deadline or otherwise respond to the Court's Order. Therefore, the Complaint in this action is dismissed without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED,


Summaries of

Williams v. St Francis Urology

United States District Court, Middle District of Georgia
Sep 20, 2023
4:23-cv-25 (CDL) (M.D. Ga. Sep. 20, 2023)
Case details for

Williams v. St Francis Urology

Case Details

Full title:EMMETT L WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. ST FRANCIS UROLOGY et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Georgia

Date published: Sep 20, 2023

Citations

4:23-cv-25 (CDL) (M.D. Ga. Sep. 20, 2023)