From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Sobel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA GAINESVILLE DIVISION
Mar 7, 2017
Case No. 1:16cv364-MW/GRJ (N.D. Fla. Mar. 7, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. 1:16cv364-MW/GRJ

03-07-2017

BRUCE MAURICE WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. ERIC SCOTT SOBEL, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. ECF No. 11. Upon consideration, no objections having been filed by the parties,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted as this Court's opinion. The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, "Plaintiff's first amended complaint, ECF No. 9, is DISMISSED." The Clerk shall close the file.

SO ORDERED on March 7, 2017.

s/ Mark E. Walker

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Williams v. Sobel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA GAINESVILLE DIVISION
Mar 7, 2017
Case No. 1:16cv364-MW/GRJ (N.D. Fla. Mar. 7, 2017)
Case details for

Williams v. Sobel

Case Details

Full title:BRUCE MAURICE WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. ERIC SCOTT SOBEL, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA GAINESVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Mar 7, 2017

Citations

Case No. 1:16cv364-MW/GRJ (N.D. Fla. Mar. 7, 2017)

Citing Cases

Kemper v. Nienhuis

Plaintiff had 90 days to choose which venue to bring [her] claims — either state court or federal court.…