From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Smith

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Feb 13, 2013
509 F. App'x 272 (4th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

No. 12-7627

02-13-2013

STANLEY LORENZO WILLIAMS, Petitioner - Appellant, v. ROBERT W. SMITH, Supt.; SECRETARY OF CORR. THEODIS BECK, Respondents - Appellees.

Stanley Lorenzo Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Carla Hollis, Assistant Attorney General, Clarence Joe DelForge, III, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.


UNPUBLISHED


Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder, District Judge. (1:07-cv-00757-TDS-WWD) Before KING, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Stanley Lorenzo Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Carla Hollis, Assistant Attorney General, Clarence Joe DelForge, III, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Stanley Lorenzo Williams appeals the district court's text order denying his Motion for Preparation of the State Court Stenographic Transcript at State Expense and Request for an Expedited Ruling on the Matter Given the Pending Appeal. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny a certificate of appealability, deny Williams' motion to expand the record, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED


Summaries of

Williams v. Smith

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Feb 13, 2013
509 F. App'x 272 (4th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

Williams v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:STANLEY LORENZO WILLIAMS, Petitioner - Appellant, v. ROBERT W. SMITH…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Feb 13, 2013

Citations

509 F. App'x 272 (4th Cir. 2013)