From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Smith

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS TEXARKANA DIVISION
Sep 4, 2012
CASE NO. 4:10-CV-04085 (W.D. Ark. Sep. 4, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 4:10-CV-04085 CASE NO. 4:10-CV-04194

09-04-2012

TRACY BERNARD WILLIAMS PLAINTIFF v. TRACEY SMITH; and SONYA SMITH DEFENDANTS TRACY BERNARD WILLIAMS PLAINTIFF v. OFFICER ADAMS; OFFICER WILKERSON; SGT. WELCH; COPR. LAFAYETTE; WARDEN GARY TURNER; and NURSE WILLIAMS DEFENDANTS


Lead Case


Member Case


ORDER

Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed August 14, 2012 by the Honorable James R. Marschewski, Chief United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. (ECF No. 70). Judge Marschewski recommends granting in part and denying in part Separate Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment. (ECF Nos. 57 and 60). The parties have not filed objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the time to object has passed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Therefore, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation in toto.

Separate Defendant Nurse William's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 57) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Specifically, the Motion (ECF No. 57) should be granted with respect to: (1) all official capacity claims against Nurse Williams; (2) Plaintiff's retaliation claim regarding denial of medical care; and (3) Plaintiff's retaliation claim regarding denial of injury report. This leaves for later resolution the individual capacity claims against Nurse Williams regarding retaliation: (1) by enticing inmates to attack Plaintiff; and (2) locking Plaintiff down in the "Super-Max." Separate Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgement (ECF No. 60) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Specifically, the Motion (ECF No. 60) should be granted with respect to: (1) all official capacity claims against all Separate Defendants; (2) all individual claims against Corporal Kelli Lafayette, and Corporal Lafayette should be dismissed; (3) all individual capacity claims of failure to protect against all Separate Defendants; (4) all individual capacity claims against Officer Sonya Smith, and Officer Sonya Smith should be dismissed; (5) all individual capacity claims of delay and denial of medical care against all Separate Defendants; and (6) all individual capacity claims regarding legal mail against all Separate Defendants. This leaves for latter resolution the individual capacity claims of (1) retaliation against Warden Gary Turner; and (2) excessive force against Corporal Tracey Smith.

IT IS SO ORDERED, this 4th day of September, 2012.

______________________

Hon. Susan O. Hickey

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Williams v. Smith

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS TEXARKANA DIVISION
Sep 4, 2012
CASE NO. 4:10-CV-04085 (W.D. Ark. Sep. 4, 2012)
Case details for

Williams v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:TRACY BERNARD WILLIAMS PLAINTIFF v. TRACEY SMITH; and SONYA SMITH…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS TEXARKANA DIVISION

Date published: Sep 4, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. 4:10-CV-04085 (W.D. Ark. Sep. 4, 2012)

Citing Cases

Braddock v. Banks

Such de minimis injuries are insufficient to establish an actionable failure to protect claim. See e.g.,…