In Williams v. Slote, 70 N.Y. 601, the demand for judgment was not for any specific sum, but generally, as in this case, for an accounting, and that defendants be adjudged to pay such sum as shall be found due thereon.
Summary of this case from Parker v. Pullman Co.Argued May 30, 1877
Decided June 12, 1877
William A. Beach, for appellant.
John S. Woodward, for respondents.
EARL, J., reads for reversal and new trial.
All concur, except RAPALLO, J., absent.
Judgment reversed.
In Williams v. Slote, 70 N.Y. 601, the demand for judgment was not for any specific sum, but generally, as in this case, for an accounting, and that defendants be adjudged to pay such sum as shall be found due thereon.
Summary of this case from Parker v. Pullman Co.Full title:ISABELLA W. WILLIAMS, Administratrix, etc., Appellant, v . DANIEL SLOTE et…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Jun 12, 1877
The complaint states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against the defendant company for the…
Wetmore v. PorterEven under the former practice this complaint would have been held good in an action of trover, and the…