From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Slanovec

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Mar 13, 2008
07 Civ. 4685 (PKC) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 13, 2008)

Opinion

07 Civ. 4685 (PKC).

March 13, 2008


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


This pro se civil rights action was referred to Magistrate Judge Frank Maas for general pretrial supervision. (Order of Aug. 24, 2007; Doc # 10) Based upon failure to comply with Rule 4(m) and the warning set forth in my Order of June 4, 2007, Judge Maas issued a Report and Recommendation, dated January 23, 2008, which recommended that the action be dismissed without prejudice (the "R R").

The R R advised the parties that they had ten days from service of the R R to file any objections, and warned that failure to timely file such objections would result in waiver of any right to object. As of the date of this Order, no objections have been filed and no request for an extension of time to object has been made. The R R expressly called plaintiffs attention to Rule 72(b), Fed.R.Civ.P., and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Plaintiff received clear notice of the consequences of the failure to object and has waived the right to object to the R R or obtain appellate review. See Frank v. Johnson, 968 F.2d 298, 300 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1038 (1992). See also Caidor v. Onondaga County, ___ F.3d ___, 2008 WL 451146 (2d Cir. Feb. 21, 2008).

The R R is adopted and the action is dismissed without prejudice.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Williams v. Slanovec

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Mar 13, 2008
07 Civ. 4685 (PKC) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 13, 2008)
Case details for

Williams v. Slanovec

Case Details

Full title:JAMES E. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. FREDERICK J. SLANOVEC, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Mar 13, 2008

Citations

07 Civ. 4685 (PKC) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 13, 2008)