From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Sisto

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 29, 2008
No. CIV S-07-2580 LEW DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 29, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-07-2580 LEW DAD P.

January 29, 2008


ORDER


On December 11, 2007, this court ordered petitioner to file an in forma pauperis affidavit or pay the appropriate filing fee for this action. On December 19, 2007, petitioner paid the filing fee. Due to a docketing error, the court was unaware that petitioner had paid the filing fee and issued findings and recommendations, recommending that this action be dismissed. The court will vacate the findings and recommendations, and the action will proceed in accordance with this order.

Since petitioner may be entitled to the requested relief if the claimed violation of constitutional rights is proved, respondents will be directed to file a response to petitioner's application.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The court's January 23, 2008 findings and recommendations are vacated;

2. Respondents are directed to file a response to petitioner's application within thirty days from the date of this order. See Rule 4, Fed.R. Governing § 2254 Cases. An answer shall be accompanied by any and all transcripts or other documents relevant to the determination of the issues presented in the application. See Rule 5, Fed.R. Governing § 2254 Cases;

3. Petitioner's reply, if any, shall be filed and served within thirty days of service of an answer;

4. If the response to petitioner's application is a motion, petitioner's opposition or statement of non-opposition shall be filed and served within thirty days of service of the motion, and respondents' reply, if any, shall be filed within fifteen days thereafter; and

5. The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this order together with a copy of petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Docket Entry Nos. 1, 2, and 3) on Michael Patrick Farrell, Senior Assistant Attorney General.


Summaries of

Williams v. Sisto

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 29, 2008
No. CIV S-07-2580 LEW DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 29, 2008)
Case details for

Williams v. Sisto

Case Details

Full title:VOLTAIRE WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. D.K. SISTO, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 29, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-07-2580 LEW DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 29, 2008)