From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Sheffield

United States District Court, Northern District of Texas
Feb 1, 2023
4:22-CV-00736-P (N.D. Tex. Feb. 1, 2023)

Opinion

4:22-CV-00736-P

02-01-2023

Kyle Williams, Plaintiff, v. Susan Sheffield, Defendant.


ORDER

MARK T. PITTMAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendations in this case. ECF No. 25. No objections were filed within the fourteen-day window. The Magistrate Judge's Recommendation is now ripe for review and the District Judge thus reviews the proposed Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for plain error. See Douglass v. United Servs. Auto Ass'n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1428-29 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc), superseded by statute on other grounds, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (extending time to file objections from ten to fourteen days).

Finding no plain error or manifest injustice in the Magistrate's reasoning, the undersigned District Judge ADOPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

It is therefore ORDERED that: (1) Sheffield's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 19) is GRANTED as Plaintiff has failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted; and (2) Plaintiff's Motion to File an Amended Complaint (ECF No. 23) is DENIED as futile.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Williams v. Sheffield

United States District Court, Northern District of Texas
Feb 1, 2023
4:22-CV-00736-P (N.D. Tex. Feb. 1, 2023)
Case details for

Williams v. Sheffield

Case Details

Full title:Kyle Williams, Plaintiff, v. Susan Sheffield, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of Texas

Date published: Feb 1, 2023

Citations

4:22-CV-00736-P (N.D. Tex. Feb. 1, 2023)