From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Seibel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 28, 2015
CASE NO. CV 14-4004-AG (PJW) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 28, 2015)

Opinion

CASE NO. CV 14-4004-AG (PJW)

11-28-2015

DONALD B. WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. K. SEIBEL, WARDEN, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed. The Court accepts the Magistrate Judge's Report and adopts it as its own findings and conclusions.

Further, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, the Court finds that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right and, therefore, a certificate of appealability is denied. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003).

DATED: November 28, 2015

/s/_________

ANDREW J. GUILFORD

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE C:\Users\dluengo\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files\Content.IE5\MSL5I4KF\WilliamsOrder accep r&r.wpd


Summaries of

Williams v. Seibel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 28, 2015
CASE NO. CV 14-4004-AG (PJW) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 28, 2015)
Case details for

Williams v. Seibel

Case Details

Full title:DONALD B. WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. K. SEIBEL, WARDEN, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 28, 2015

Citations

CASE NO. CV 14-4004-AG (PJW) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 28, 2015)