From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Securitas Sec. Servs. USA, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 11, 2012
CASE NO. CV 12-1885-GHK (SSx) (C.D. Cal. May. 11, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. CV 12-1885-GHK (SSx)

05-11-2012

Michael Williams, Plaintiff, v. Securitas Security Services USA, Inc., et al., Defendants.


JUDGMENT

Pursuant to the Court's April 10, 2012 Order, IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that Plaintiff Michael Williams's ("Plaintiff") claims against Defendants Securitas Security Services USA, Inc., Pinkerton Government, Inc., and Paragon Systems, Inc. are DISMISSED with prejudice. Pursuant to the Court's May 11, 2012 Order, IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that Plaintiff's claims against Defendant the United States of America are DISMISSED without prejudice. Plaintiff shall take nothing by this Complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________

GEORGE H. KING

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Williams v. Securitas Sec. Servs. USA, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 11, 2012
CASE NO. CV 12-1885-GHK (SSx) (C.D. Cal. May. 11, 2012)
Case details for

Williams v. Securitas Sec. Servs. USA, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Michael Williams, Plaintiff, v. Securitas Security Services USA, Inc., et…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 11, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. CV 12-1885-GHK (SSx) (C.D. Cal. May. 11, 2012)

Citing Cases

Ngambo v. Soc. Sec. Admin.

.... Because the law requires a plaintiff to exhaust her administrative remedies before pursuing an FTCA…