From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Schriro

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Jun 2, 2006
No. 05-2440-PHX-ROS (D. Ariz. Jun. 2, 2006)

Opinion

No. 05-2440-PHX-ROS.

June 2, 2006


ORDER


On August 12, 2005 Petitioner filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. #1). On May 9, 2006, Magistrate Judge Sitver issued a Report and Recommendation ("RR") recommending that the petition be denied and dismissed with prejudice (Doc. #14). No objections were filed by either party.

The Court "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). It is "clear that the district judge must review the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise." United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) ( en banc) (emphasis in original); Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1126 (D. Ariz. 2003) ("Following Reyna-Tapia, this Court concludes that de novo review of factual and legal issues is required if objections are made, `but not otherwise."'). District courts are not required to conduct "any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection." Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). No objection having been made, the Court will adopt the RR in full.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. #14) is ADOPTED and this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.


Summaries of

Williams v. Schriro

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Jun 2, 2006
No. 05-2440-PHX-ROS (D. Ariz. Jun. 2, 2006)
Case details for

Williams v. Schriro

Case Details

Full title:Robert Lee Williams, a.k.a. Robert Lee Green, Petitioner, v. Dora B…

Court:United States District Court, D. Arizona

Date published: Jun 2, 2006

Citations

No. 05-2440-PHX-ROS (D. Ariz. Jun. 2, 2006)