From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WICHITA FALLS DIVISION
Jan 21, 2021
Civil Action No. 7:20-cv-00008-O-BP (N.D. Tex. Jan. 21, 2021)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 7:20-cv-00008-O-BP

01-21-2021

MELISSA DAWN WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS , CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation in this case (ECF No. 20), issued on December 30, 2020. No objections were filed, and the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation is ripe for review. The District Judge reviewed the proposed Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the undersigned District Judge believes that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court.

Accordingly, the Court REVERSES the Administrative Law Judge's decision and REMANDS this action to the Commissioner for further proceedings in accordance with this Order and the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

SO ORDERED on this 21st day of January, 2021.

/s/ _________

Reed O'Connor

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Williams v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WICHITA FALLS DIVISION
Jan 21, 2021
Civil Action No. 7:20-cv-00008-O-BP (N.D. Tex. Jan. 21, 2021)
Case details for

Williams v. Saul

Case Details

Full title:MELISSA DAWN WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WICHITA FALLS DIVISION

Date published: Jan 21, 2021

Citations

Civil Action No. 7:20-cv-00008-O-BP (N.D. Tex. Jan. 21, 2021)

Citing Cases

Montano v. Saul

As to the Commissioner's argument that Dr. Ikram's letter was irrelevant because the physician's evaluations…