Summary
affirming ALJ's conclusion that plaintiff was only mildly limited in adapting or managing himself where exams showed clear, logical, goal-directed thought processes and appropriate mood and affect
Summary of this case from Dawson v. SaulOpinion
No. 5:18-CV-214-FL
07-08-2019
ANTONIO LEE WILLIAMS Plaintiff, v. ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.
JUDGMENT
Decision by Court.
This action came before the Honorable Louise W. Flanagan, United States District Judge, for consideration of the parties' cross-motions for judgment on the pleadings and the memorandum and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, to which objections were not filed. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED in accordance with the court's order entered July 8, 2019, and for the reasons set forth more specifically therein, that plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings is granted and defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings is denied. This matter is remanded to defendant pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings. This Judgment Filed and Entered on July 8 , 2019, and Copies To: George C. Piemonte (via CM/ECF Notice of Electronic Filing)
Gabriel R. Deadwyler / Keeya M. Jeffrey (via CM/ECF Notice of Electronic Filing) July 8, 2019
PETER A. MOORE, JR. CLERK
/s/ Sandra K Collins
(By) Sandra K. Collins, Deputy Clerk