From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Sandstrom

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Feb 14, 2008
Civil Action No. 07-cv-00024-REB-KLM (D. Colo. Feb. 14, 2008)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 07-cv-00024-REB-KLM.

February 14, 2008


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Return of Property [Docket No. 61; filed July 11, 2007] (the "Motion"). Defendants have not responded.

Plaintiff requests that this Court issue an Order compelling the Office of the Inspector General to release to Plaintiff three postal money orders that were allegedly seized from him. The Office of the Inspector General is not a party to this action. The Court lacks authority to order non-parties to take the action requested here. See, e.g., Queen v. U.S., 2007 WL 38079 (D.Kan. 2007). Therefore, the Court lacks jurisdiction to enter an order compelling the Office of the Inspector General to release Plaintiff's postal money orders. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion [Docket No. 61] is DENIED.


Summaries of

Williams v. Sandstrom

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Feb 14, 2008
Civil Action No. 07-cv-00024-REB-KLM (D. Colo. Feb. 14, 2008)
Case details for

Williams v. Sandstrom

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY C. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff(s), v. GUS F. SANDSTROM, RICK MEHOON, MATT…

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Feb 14, 2008

Citations

Civil Action No. 07-cv-00024-REB-KLM (D. Colo. Feb. 14, 2008)