From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Rudd-Nilsen Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1916
176 App. Div. 889 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)

Opinion

December, 1916.


Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide event. We find no evidence that the defendant, appellant, neglected any duty it owed to this plaintiff. Jenks, P.J., Carr, Stapleton, Mills and Rich, JJ., concurred.


Summaries of

Williams v. Rudd-Nilsen Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1916
176 App. Div. 889 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)
Case details for

Williams v. Rudd-Nilsen Company

Case Details

Full title:PETER WILLIAMS, an Infant, by MARY WILLIAMS, His Guardian ad Litem…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 1, 1916

Citations

176 App. Div. 889 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)