From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Roche

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 25, 2006
No. CIV S-02-1901 DFL JFM PS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 25, 2006)

Opinion

No. CIV S-02-1901 DFL JFM PS.

August 25, 2006


ORDER


Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21).

On August 2, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. No objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed August 2, 2006, are adopted in full; and

2. Defendant's September 1, 2005 motion to dismiss is granted.


Summaries of

Williams v. Roche

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 25, 2006
No. CIV S-02-1901 DFL JFM PS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 25, 2006)
Case details for

Williams v. Roche

Case Details

Full title:SANDRA E. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. JAMES G. ROCHE, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 25, 2006

Citations

No. CIV S-02-1901 DFL JFM PS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 25, 2006)