From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Potter

United States District Court, E.D. Texas
May 5, 2006
Civil Action No. 1:03-CV-1409 (E.D. Tex. May. 5, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 1:03-CV-1409.

May 5, 2006


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


The court referred this matter to the Honorable Earl S. Hines, United States Magistrate Judge, for pretrial proceedings pursuant to Referral Order entered on August 11, 2005. The court has received and considered the report of the United States magistrate judge, who recommends that the court dismiss this action sua sponte for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with the court's order. No objections have been filed.

The magistrate judge's report is hereby ADOPTED. The purpose of the referral having been served, it is further

ORDERED that the reference to the magistrate judge is VACATED.


Summaries of

Williams v. Potter

United States District Court, E.D. Texas
May 5, 2006
Civil Action No. 1:03-CV-1409 (E.D. Tex. May. 5, 2006)
Case details for

Williams v. Potter

Case Details

Full title:PATRICIA WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. JOHN E. POTTER, POSTMASTER GENERAL, U.S…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Texas

Date published: May 5, 2006

Citations

Civil Action No. 1:03-CV-1409 (E.D. Tex. May. 5, 2006)

Citing Cases

Parra v. The Kan. City S. Ry. Co.

McCullough v. Lynaugh, 835 F.2d 1126, 1127 (5th Cir. 1988) (finding that a district court may sua sponte…

Arevalo v. Axios Indus. Maint. Contractors

; McCullough v. Lynaugh, 835 F.2d 1126, 1127 (5th Cir. 1988) (finding that a district court may sua sponte…