Opinion
Civil Action 5:22-cv-00376-TES-CHW
08-08-2024
DARRION WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN JOSEPH POLITE, et al., Defendants.
ORDER ADOPTING THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S RECOMMENDATION
TILMAN E. SELF, III, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Before the Court is the United States Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) [Doc. 48] regarding Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 44]. The magistrate judge granted Plaintiff's request for an extension of time to file objections to the R&R, giving him until July 26, 2024, to do so. [Doc. 50]; see [Doc. 49]. Because no party filed a timely objection, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) in connection with Fed.R.Civ.P. 6(a)(1) & (d). Finding no error, the Court ADOPTS the magistrate judge's R&R [Doc. 13] and MAKES IT THE ORDER OF THE COURT.
Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 44] as to Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Polite, J. Williams, Ball, and Turner. However, the Court DENIES Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 44] as to Plaintiff's claims against Defendants T. Williams, Horne, Douglas, and Watkins. The Court will schedule the remaining claims for trial in the immediate future.
SO ORDERED,