From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Pliler

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 1, 2011
No. 2:03-cv-0721-JAM JFM (HC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 1, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2:03-cv-0721-JAM JFM (HC)

08-01-2011

RICHARD ALEX WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. CHERYL PLILER, Respondent.


ORDER

On July 28, 2011, the court held a status conference in this matter. Victor Haltom appeared for petitioner. Carlos A. Martinez appeared for respondent. Upon discussion of counsel and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner is directed to file an amended petition within 29 days of the date of this order addressing his claim brought pursuant to Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986);

2. Respondent shall file an answer 29 days thereafter; and

3. Petitioner's traverse, if any, shall be filed within ten days after receipt of the answer.

______________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Williams v. Pliler

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 1, 2011
No. 2:03-cv-0721-JAM JFM (HC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 1, 2011)
Case details for

Williams v. Pliler

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD ALEX WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. CHERYL PLILER, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 1, 2011

Citations

No. 2:03-cv-0721-JAM JFM (HC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 1, 2011)