From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Planning Zoning Commission

Appellate Court of Connecticut
Apr 14, 1987
523 A.2d 931 (Conn. App. Ct. 1987)

Opinion

(4869)

Submitted on briefs February 3, 1987

Decision released April 14, 1987

Appeal from the decision of the defendant conditionally approving the plaintiffs' resubdivision application, brought to the Superior Court in the judicial district of Litchfield and tried to the court, Maloney, J.; judgment sustaining, in part, the plaintiffs' appeal, from which the defendant appealed to this court. No error.

Thomas P. Byrne filed a brief for the appellant (defendant).

David M. Cusick filed a brief for the appellee (plaintiff).


In this zoning case, we granted the petition of the defendant, the Norfolk planning and zoning commission, to appeal from the judgment of the trial court. That judgment, inter alia, sustained the appeal of the plaintiffs from the action of the defendant imposing an access restriction on its approval of the plaintiffs' application for a subdivision. Upon full consideration, we are convinced that the trial court was correct in holding that this case is controlled by Park Construction Co. v. Planning Zoning Board of Appeals, 142 Conn. 30, 38-40, 110 A.2d 614 (1954). See also Daviau v. Planning Commission, 174 Conn. 354, 359 n. 3, 387 A.2d 562 (1978).


Summaries of

Williams v. Planning Zoning Commission

Appellate Court of Connecticut
Apr 14, 1987
523 A.2d 931 (Conn. App. Ct. 1987)
Case details for

Williams v. Planning Zoning Commission

Case Details

Full title:GLORIA V. WILLIAMS ET AL. v. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE TOWN OF…

Court:Appellate Court of Connecticut

Date published: Apr 14, 1987

Citations

523 A.2d 931 (Conn. App. Ct. 1987)
523 A.2d 931

Citing Cases

Timber Trails v. Plan. Z. Comm'n, Sherman

tently strictly construed that statute, concluding that a planning commission has only the powers which are…