From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Phillips

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 22, 2011
Case No. 1:10-cv-0131 AWI JLT (PC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 22, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 1:10-cv-0131 AWI JLT (PC) Doc. 40

09-22-2011

SYLESTER WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. BOBBY PHILLIPS, Defendant.


ORDER AMENDING SCHEDULING ORDER

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff alleges that Defendant was deliberately indifferent to his health and safety in violation of the Eighth Amendment. (Doc. 11.)

Defendant seeks an order of the Court permitting depositions taken in this matter to be conducted via video-conferencing. (Doc. 40) Defendant explains that his lawyer is located 242 mils from the place of Plaintiff's incarceration and, due to the severe budget crisis facing the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, travel is cost prohibitive. Id.

Therefore, good cause appearing, the Court ORDERS that depositions taken in this matter, including the deposition of Plaintiff, may be conducted via video-conferencing provided that the prison where Plaintiff is housed can, and is willing to, accommodate this request.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Jennifer L. Thurston

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Williams v. Phillips

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 22, 2011
Case No. 1:10-cv-0131 AWI JLT (PC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 22, 2011)
Case details for

Williams v. Phillips

Case Details

Full title:SYLESTER WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. BOBBY PHILLIPS, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 22, 2011

Citations

Case No. 1:10-cv-0131 AWI JLT (PC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 22, 2011)